A great way to address this problem is to put a person who has a specific problem to think about with their own creative thinking in mind. Maybe they can figure out a solution for their problem for the cost of a new project or simply do it for the cost of a new product.
The main reason we have a lot of people who are doing this is that they usually make their own decisions like the content of a story. They probably will have more free time in a certain environment, but they will have to put up with people who think more about their own lives than they actually do.
Creativity is not a linear process, so we can’t just throw a bunch of people in a room and say, “Here are a bunch of people who have a problem, and you are going to solve it.” Creativity is a combination of lots of people working on a problem, not just one person.
This is why a group of people who don’t follow the same methods or have the same opinions as themselves are very good at solving problems for each other. A group of artists or musicians that don’t even have a name for what they are doing but they just know how to play something or write a note in a particular way, they are very likely to work well together because they have a common goal and they all know what each other are trying to do.
We don’t have to be sure.
This is what I think our solution is: A group of rational humans who are the same height, weight, and size as each other, but who have different ideas on how to accomplish those goals.
We’re not in complete agreement. We agree to disagree on many things.
The group in question are developers who all know how to write notes in a particular way and have a common goal. They all know each other, they all have different ideas on how to accomplish their goals and they all know they are working together to achieve their goal.
This group of developers know they are working together to accomplish their goal, and they know they are not in complete agreement. We don’t want to say it’s a disagreement over their idea on how to develop X, we want to say it’s a disagreement over what’s the right approach for X. Or, to use a slightly different term, we want them to think of X as a system that we all agree on, as opposed to a set of ideas that we all disagree on.
It sounds like this group of developers has a lot of ideas, but none of them really seem to be in agreement. They all seem to think they are in complete agreement, but they are not. They are all trying to work together towards the same goal, but they are not in complete agreement. They are all working to make the game better, but they are not in complete agreement.